Ojai Post Office
and Comet Hale-Bopp,
as photographed by
Michael McFadden

Place a classified

Display advertising

Subscribe

LIVE CHP

California Lottery

Road conditions

Visitors Guide

Real estate

Ojai phonebook

Related sites



THE OVN
408A Bryant Circle
Ojai, CA 93023
805.646.1476


e-mail:

Letter to the Editor

Guest Editorial

Thumbs Up or Down

Calendar of events

Staff mailboxes

 

HOMEPAGE | HEADLINES | OPINIONS | POLICE BLOTTER | OBITUARIES | SPORTS

Letters for the week ending December 20, 2002

Click Here to send a letter to the editor

Plays staged at NHS cafetorium

12-16
To the editor:
You won't want to miss the drama at Nordhoff this weekend. Nordhoff students (along with community members Jim Lashly, Elizabeth C. Rosengren and Phil Casanta) have put together two short plays in the cafetorium that will make you cry, and then laugh till you cry. "The Long Christmas Dinner," directed by NHS senior Erica Hartman is 20 minutes of generational drama with a long cast of characters, who pass into and out of a family Christmas dinner. Those who pass through the door stage right, go to the great beyond; bring your hankie, you'll cry as these lovely teens pass.
Keep out your hankie, though, because "Starkist," a play written by NHS junior Sarah Mirk, is hilarious. Not necessarily about the holidays, still, it will leave you with a glow to last till Christmas. Don't miss these dramatic efforts at NHS Friday and Saturday at 7:30 p.m. Admission is $5 for adults and $3 for students and seniors.
"The Long Christmas Dinner" stars Claire Haider, Chad Butler, Jassira Vardak, Randy Titus, Courtney Letvinchuck, Andrew Nelson, Rachel Ward, Kaeli Dwire, Noelle Morris, Sam Gay, Caitlin Smith and Joel Hunt.
"Starkist" stars Darienne Gross, Sarah Hartigan, Kelly Leech and Das Baker.

Kathi Smith
Ojai

Join in solstice celebration

12-9
To the editor:
Through the ages at the winter solstice, humankind has gathered in community to light fires to chase the dark away and to celebrate the return of the sun. They decorated their homes with evergreens, symbols of eternal life. In all cultures, the return of the sun has been met with symbolic ritual and festivity, making connections with nature and the rhythms of the Earth.
Today, more than ever, we must take time to come together to honor the principle of Essential Divinity, welcome the return of the light, and the spirit of hope which burns in our hearts. The darkest night of the year is a time of turning inward, experiencing the inner light within, as well as a night of revelry.
We at Meditation Mount invite you to join us in a community celebration of the winter solstice on Saturday, Dec. 21, from 5 to 7 p.m. There will be music, readings of poetry, myths, storytelling, symbolic ritual and candlelight meditation, concluding with a potluck dinner.
Hooray for the solstice! Light a candle! The light shines in the darkness!

Jean M. Bates
Executive Director
Meditation Mount

Modern Stone Age perils

12-9
To the editor:
I was newly minted at the close of World War I ("the war to end all wars"), lived through World War II and its subsequent progeny, Korea, and Vietnam, and agree that war is hell and stupid. Conversely, I think it is extremely naive to assume that peaceful protests will inspire barbarians to put aside evil intentions and weapons and sit quietly alongside on the moral high ground.
Mahatma Gandhi, the disciple of conciliatory negotiation, was assassinated, unarmed Jews perished in Nazi concentration camps, nonthreatening tourists were blown to bits in Bali, quiescent Muslim women can be stoned to death for presumed moral lapses and, here in America, several thousand innocent men, women and children lost their lives on September 11.
Half of the planet's denizens seem not to have evolved beyond the Stone Age, placing the rest of us in constant jeopardy. Barring a global epiphany, it doesn't appear that things are going to change any time soon.
The concerns of the People in Black are understandable, but they might do well to focus some of their energies on a real war taking place in this country, now - the war on crime. According to recent government figures, major crime, in all its aspects, has escalated alarmingly in the last few years. Murder, nationwide, in 2001, claimed 15,980 victims, with Los Angeles accounting for 1,079 of them. In fact, Los Angeles presently has the dubious distinction of being the murder capital of the United States, with violent death statistics so mind-numbing as to read more like the latest sports tallies. It's as if we're auditioning for the reality version of "Clockwork Orange," that fantasy film about a civilization gone mad.
On a lighter note, however, there is some good news out there, and from the fashion world, no less! It seems high-rise jeans are coming back in style because the low riders have gone as low as they can go. Goodbye, navel displays; welcome back, taste. It is to be hoped.

Gerry Baur
Ojai

Free forests groups get grant

12-9
To the editor:
The organizations, Free Our Forests and the National Forest Defense Alliance, received a generous grant of $5,400 on Dec. 4 from the Fund for Santa Barbara, which is a nonprofit foundation made up of grassroots activists and community organizations working for social, economic and environmental justice in Santa Barbara County.
FOF and NFDA are based in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties and are the leading activist groups in the nationwide effort to stop the U.S. Forest Service's Adventure Pass Recreation Fee Demonstration Program.
The fund's grant money to FOF and NFDA is earmarked for use in the class action suit to end the Adventure Pass Program, which was filed locally this past September. The Adventure Pass Program is a corporately lobbied forest recreational fee, passed by Congress as a test, and designed to allow private development and commercialization of public lands on a grand scale.
FOF and NFDA are extremely grateful to the Fund for Santa Barbara for this financial assistance and to activist Greg Kappos for writing the grant. The public is encouraged to donate to FOF at P.O. Box 411, Ojai, CA 93024, and especially to the Fund for Santa Barbara at 924 Anacapa St., Suite 4-H, Santa Barbara, CA 93101-2192.

Heidi Mauer
Chairman, Free Our Forests
Ojai

Soup reminder of white folk's gifts

12-6
To the editor:
Much has been written about the mistreatment of the American Indians, but there is seldom mention of their debt to the white man.
There are many benefits of Western medicine and, of course, those lucrative casino franchises, but one debt towers above them all: not having to eat acorn soup.
Earl Bates' column (Dec. 4) brought back a painful memory for me: growing up in Ojai in the 1950s, I once earned a Cub Scout merit badge by preparing acorn soup. I collected and shelled the acorns, then prepared the soup exactly as Earl described, by grinding, leaching and boiling them into soup.
That evening at dinner, after my family had sampled this delicacy, I had to concur with my father - source of my Indian blood - who expressed a newfound appreciation for the ways of the white man, and, in particular, my mother's ham and split-pea soup.
Bon appetit, Earl.

Ken Shelton
Ojai

Walls disrupt Ojai's beauty

12-9
To the editor:
Fences. We need fences and walls to keep the animals in the yard and the kids out of the pool and dirt up the slope. Sometimes a wall is nice to define a place or to just enjoy a piece of fine workmanship. But, the beauty of our valley has been progressively diminished by a major escalation in construction of walls and fences which are too many, too large and just don't fit.
I suspect many are built as a search for security or privacy, others as a statement of style or presence. Consider that a genuinely effective security fence will also keep out your rescuers and makes it less likely your neighbors will be able to discover the need for help. Remember the uncomfortable stories of people perishing in home fires because of the security bars on the windows. To the end of "safety," the effort and money are better spent on making your community a better place by volunteering and donations. As for privacy, trust me, there is nothing you're doing in private that is of interest to the rest of us.
The cumulative effect of these multiple barriers is to erode our sense of unity with our valley and with each other. We become a collection of well-defined and well-defended parcels rather than a cohesive community of fellow citizens.
I ask a favor - once you've decided you need a new wall or fence - wait a year. With a bit of reflection, maybe you'll see Ojai would be a better place without it. Then you can spend the savings on some project to really help our hometown

Al Stroberg
Ojai

Chilled by state-led violence

12-10
To the editor:
Was anyone else disturbed by the presence of young people garbed in camouflage uniforms guarding and patrolling the recent Ventura Holiday Street Fair? I wondered if this was to start getting U.S. citizens used to a military presence as pressure builds to ensure conformity to the rules imposed by the Homeland Security and Patriots Acts or perhaps to quell the growing opposition to the fully orchestrated propaganda supporting an out-of-control war machine.
Does anyone else find it chilling that some young people have been so steeped in violence that they believe conflicts can only be resolved by destroying whichever "enemy," is currently "out to get us"? Are these young people aware or don't they care that despite promises of money, educational and travel opportunities plus instant man and now womanhood status, proffered by the military, the sole purpose of this training is to stifle individuality, sensitivity, compassion and humanity, so they as "universal" soldiers can kill or be killed based on the belief that they are doing it for god and country?
Or, do some of these young people have so much fear, anger and hatred that they actually want to go and kill others or are they so unhappy that they consciously or unconsciously seek suicide by warfare?
If we cannot stop the current regime's rush to war, will the parents of these young people find justification in religion or patriotism and comfort by lighting a candle commemorating the death of a child when their son or daughter comes back in a body bag?
How do parents whose children returned from past wars suffering from mental, emotional and physical diseases which were not acknowledged or treated by the very government which sent them until 10, 20 or 30 years passed, cope with their grief? How did they feel when mutated grandchildren were born as a result of "herbicides," mandated experimental vaccinations or spent uranium shell casings?
No matter what supposed threat there is to our country, I do not believe unilateral, pre-emptive war is the only solution. I believe there is again a corporate agenda and the only profits will be made by oil companies, weapons manufacturers, drug dealers and all others who benefit from the knee-jerk emotional responses of non-profiting working class Americans whose sons and daughters become pawns in a deadly game.
Truth be told, I feel sad that they and their parents do not want to join with others to choose instead to strive to create a non-hostile, genuinely pro-life environment right here in the U.S.A., which could be an example for people around the world. I really do not care if young people do not want to live long, full, rich, non-fear-filled lives. What I adamantly oppose is spending of billions and billions of dollars to give them an opportunity to fulfill their homicidal/suicidal death wish at the expense of the rest of our society's urgent needs, thereby undermining true homeland and global security.
We must stop the anti-life now!

Margot Eiser
Ojai

Argument goes to serve point

12-10
To the editor:
In reply to Matthew Baxter's letter about peace (OVN 12-4-02):
Mr. Baxter, I sense that you are confused and upset by the process of exploring the nature and value of peace and how it might be won. While you contend that questioning the power of nonviolent conflict resolution to produce peace with radical Islam is vitriolic and simplistic, I believe that pursuing peace by simply demanding and, subsequently, relying upon universal pacifism is folly.
Your hypothetical alteration of history leading up to World War II illustrates your argument well, but ultimately serves to prove my point. Pretending for the sake of your argument that Europeans practiced peace vigils prior to the war is easy because they actually did so in great numbers. Pretending that Nazis might have embraced peace and love in response to all the peace demonstrations is a little harder, but I'll give it a go.
So now where are we? We are sitting here, going nowhere, making believe that peace vigils produced the desired results and rendered mid-20th century Europe free of war, but the Germans did invade Czechoslovakia and World War II did happen, in spite of, and to some degree because of, the peace activists who insisted on making believe that appeasing Hitler would avert war (try an Internet search under the words "German invasion" - the horror stories are endless and they all began with the "peace in our time" movement to appease a monster).
In fact, your historical fantasy only supports the notion that a world in which all conflicts are resolved without war would be a world without war, but not necessarily a world without injustice, mass suffering and oppression. For instance, consider a world that is at peace (i.e., not at war) after being overrun by Moslem radical fundamentalists (who believe themselves to be on a mission from Allah to accomplish this very goal). This would be a brutal world where people, especially women, are routinely beaten, tortured and executed for, among other things, breaches of religious etiquette.
The conflict between radical Islam and the rest of civilization has a long history of violence. September 11th escalated this violence and brought it to our shores. Since then our Islamic enemies have made their intentions toward us clear and they laugh mockingly at our talk of nonviolent conflict resolution.
Part of your thinking about peace probably stems from a cultural value that we both share. Our culture tends to admire the person (or country) that shows considered self-restraint in response to minor or sporadic aggression. In America, such a person (or country) is seen as strong, confident and forgiving, but in the Middle East such restraint is generally seen as weak, submissive and cowardly, an invitation to hit again.
You believe my image of radical Islam is the invention of the right wing, military-industrial-complex-owned media, but you would have a hard time convincing anyone who has fled the Middle East for the sanctuary of our shores of this. The truth is while you are vilifying America for mobilizing in defense of your right, among others, to vilify America, I am expressing real concern for the very lives of men, women and children in America and around the world. I want to protect them from death and oppression. Just as death is not the worst thing that can happen to a living person, some alternatives are even worse than war.
In conclusion, I don't know where you got the notion that I count you among " Cro-Mags (who) idle away the hours in a veritable cannibalization of whatever peace is left after the black cloud of terrorism dooms us." I didn't know you existed nor had I evaluated your state of evolution until I read your letter. More to the point, even with the wide latitude afforded by poetic license one cannot cannibalize an indivisible state of being such as the absence of war and so I would never suspect you of such an endeavor. I actually sympathize with your wishful thinking, but its limitations conspire against any credibility in your position. Mr. Baxter, determined aggressors not only exist, they are very hard to wish away.

Richard Keit
Ojai

Scholarship perfect gift for family

12-13
To the editor:
As many of you know, Deno Lepas passed away Oct. 7, 2002. Deno was a 35-year teacher at Nordhoff High and during that time he touched many lives. His industrial arts classes prepared many students for future careers, future successes and life. It is in his honor, we are setting up a scholarship fund. There are several reasons for setting up the fund, but two of the most significant are to continually allow his children to see what a special man he was and to honor students who may develop into the future Deno Lepases we need so much in education.
If you were one of his former students who was touched by his magic, please consider contributing to this fund. Many of the parents of Deno's former students know how valuable his contributions were to their child. If you would like to consider the holiday gift that keeps on giving, please help with contributions to the scholarship.
Presently, we have collected more than $4,300 for the scholarship fund. The goal is to raise $8,000 so the fund will go on forever. Deno's impact on Nordhoff High School and the Ojai community will extend way beyond his lifetime. We would like the scholarship to continue to honor Nordhoff students forever.
Contributions can be sent care of Ken Reeves at Nordhoff High School, 1401 Maricopa Highway, Ojai, CA 93023. Checks should be made out to Nordhoff High School-Deno Lepas Fund.
During the holiday season, we are all looking for the perfect gift. This scholarship fund certainly can be the perfect gift the the Lepas family and the students of Nordhoff!

Ken Reeves
Nordhoff High School
Ojai

On the nature of war and peace

12-16
To the editor:
The following are quotes from men of history on the nature of war and peace:
Dwight D. Eisenhower: "We have arrived at that point, my friends, when war does not present the possibility of victory or defeat. War would present to us only the alternative in degrees of destruction. There could be no truly successful outcome."
Nikita S. Khrushnev: "General and complete disarmament is the avenue leading to the deliverance of mankind from the calamities of war Long live peace throughout the world!"
Mahatma Gandhi: "Nonviolence is a weapon of the strong."
Martin Luther King: "The choice is either nonviolence or nonexistence."
Sigmund Freud: "All that produces ties of sentiment between man and man must serve as war's antidote." Leo Tolstoy: "We must not obey man more than God, and no matter what they may do, we cannot and will not obey them."
Victor Hugo: "A day will come when a cannon will be exhibited in public museums, just as an instrument of torture is now, and people will be astonished how such a thing could have been."
Lao-Tse: "He who goes forward with weapons of war, honors the instruments of evil omen."
The Bible: "Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more."

Jesse Lovejoy
Ojai


To ignore threat is to ignore history

12-06
To the editor:
Being a history buff, I feel compelled to comment on recent letters to this paper expressing outrage at Richard Keit for questioning the effectiveness of nonviolent principles as a response to our current international crisis. One letter in particular displayed a shocking level of historical sophistry when the writer attempted to prove his point by noting that history would have been different if the Germans had been "doves" rather than "hawks." Of course, all history would have been different if people had behaved better, but his example ignores the truth of what really happened.
While the Germans were behaving like hawks, the British government was committed to a peaceful resolution with Germany. Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain felt that Germany had been treated unfairly in the wake of World War I. As such, he engaged in a strategy of appeasement leading to the signing of the Munich Agreement, after which he proclaimed that they had achieved "peace in our time."
The closing remarks of his speech to parliament on Oct. 3, 1938 were, "Ever since I assumed my present office, my main purpose has been to work for the pacification of Europe, for the removal of those suspicions and those animosities which have so long poisoned the air. The path which leads to appeasement is long and bristles with obstacles. The question of Czechoslovakia is the latest and perhaps the most dangerous. Now that we have got past it, I feel that it may be possible to make further progress along the road to sanity."
The problem was that they were not past the question of Czechoslovakia. In fact, after receiving a piece of Czechoslovakia in return for not invading the rest of it, Hitler broke the Munich Agreement less than a year later by invading the rest of Czechoslovakia.
The lesson of this piece of history (and of much of human history) seems, superficially, to mean that nonviolence is not effective against violent aggressors. This is not always the case, though. Nonviolent action has worked in several situations - most notably by Gandhi in India's independence from Britain.
Gandhi employed nonviolence effectively for two reasons. The first was that it appealed to the aggressor's sense of shame and justice. The second was that it was the only option they had, given the fact that the British had disarmed India. This led Gandhi to write, "Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."
The reason that passive resistance works is that it forces the aggressor to question his own position. This works especially well in the context of the
Judeo-Christian ethic because, as a society, we have the freedom and inclination to question the motives of our own society. This is so common to us that we generally don't even notice it. One shouldn't assume from this that all societies tolerate this tradition.
The real question is not whether Islamic fundamentalists (note that I am not including all or most Muslims in this category) pose a threat to us; the question is whether nonviolence is an effective strategy in the face of that threat. To ignore the threat of Islamic fundamentalism is to ignore the histories of countries such as Greece, Armenia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, India, and even Austria - just to name a few.
Sadly, the weight of history supports Mr. Keit's objection. One would have a difficult time in trying to use history as a justification for nonviolence in the face of Islamic fundamentalism. Historically, the only real defense seems to be conversion to Islam.
There is, however, an effective argument for nonviolence - the spiritual argument. This argument is very compelling on a personal level. It requires the practitioner to forego his baser instincts and take up the mantle of martyrdom.
Is it morally right, then, to force others to accept martyrdom? How is the act of forcing someone to be passive in the face of a real threat morally superior to bidding or conscripting young men to risk their lives in defense of others? Why is it considered vitriolic to ask these questions? Do these questions not come from the same tradition that causes us to question war in the first place?
I am not foolish enough to believe that I can change anyone's mind on this subject; nor would I deny that American history reveals our own atrocities. I am only trying to point out that attacking Mr. Keit for posing the question avoids dealing with the question.
It occurs to me that many people who object to Mr. Keit's opinion view the United States as more of a threat to the world than Islamic fundamentalism. They claim that we are all brainwashed by the current administration and the media. I would ask those people to simply go to the library and research Islamic history instead of speculating about what could have been.

Matthew Sewell
Ojai


Departing artist will be missed

12-17
To the editor:
This is an open letter to Gayel Childress.
Dear Childress (as I love to address you):
The announcement of your departure from the Ojai art scene came to me in the same manner as I always perceived you: sharp and sudden, irrevocable and drastic. This is not meant to make you feel guilty. Maybe we should feel guilty, because most of us who buzzed around you knew that you were our big mamma, and yet didn't do enough to keep you on your feet.
You, like a mother, gave us flight, gave us the opportunity, the good advice, the support. We felt unique in being associated with you, we felt the inspiration of making art for art's sake. We felt accredited and enthusiastic about our endeavors. In your big artist's heart, you legitimized our attitudes toward creativeness, and we frolicked around you like avid sucklings that nourished from your spiritual sustenance.
Ojai won't be the same without you. You were Ojai, because its spirit reigned through you. You were the place where one could hope to express oneself without the expectation of selling. That was very generous and idealistic. You believed in diversity, but all the more you believed in freedom of expression, in human effort and artistic conscience.
We'll miss you. Part of us goes with you. We feel orphaned and somehow lonely, as if standing at the mouth of an abyss. We'll never experience in the same way that feeling of brotherhood, and the pride of being part of your artist's family.
I hope that this is not the end. Like Beato, we believe in reincarnation and, in my heart of hearts, I trust that you'll find the way to resurrect and rebuild what was the most unique art corner in the Ojai Valley: the Gayel Childress Gallery.
In the meanwhile, we love you, and wish you the best.

Sylvia Raz
Ojai


'Twas the night, Ojai version

'Twas the night before Christmas and all through the house
every creature was stirring, 'specially the mouse.
The cat had been chasing her day in and day out
and mother was shouting, "Get out, get out!"
The stockings were hung by the chimney over there.
There was Mama's and mine and the boys, who didn't care,
that sissy's was missing and found absolutely - no where.
The children were fighting and not ready for bed.
Mama was screaming and here's what she said,
"Leave your brother alone and go turn out the light,
you'd better be good or there'll be NO Santa tonight.
Hurry up, father and I want some sleep,
I mean it now, not a sound, not a peep!"
With that she turned and started for bed,
then she yelled, "Has the dog been fed?"
Then something happened just around four,
the dog started barking and scratching the door.
Daddy rolled over as Mama ran to see,
just who was out there - oh who could it be?
And what to her tired ol' eyes did appear,
but Santa and eight tiny reindeer.
Now the dog was barking louder and moving real quick.
She nipped at the heels of dear ol' St. Nick.
As mama stared at the man who stood in our house,
all became quiet, even the mouse.
From his feet to his head
he was dressed all in red.
With eyes that twinkled and a beard like snow,
his cheeks were rosy and his face was aglow.
He moved rather slowly and looked a bit beat.
Mama knew right away he needed something to eat.
So she fixed Santa a snack
as he unloaded his pack,
Without a sound, not a noise,
he filled the stockings with toys.
And when he was finished he headed for the door,
but he tripped over the roller blades that were left on the floor.
Then with a wink of his eye and a hearty ol' wave,
he was off again in his toy-filled sleigh.
Filled with joy on this magical night
Mama watched as he drove out of sight.

- Donna Sallen, Ojai

© 2002 The Ojai Valley News

Return to editorial search

Back to the news