|
Groundwater meeting seeks equilibrium
By Jesse Phelps
The fish vs. farmer debate continued Thursday
night at the Ojai City Council chambers as the Ojai Basin Groundwater
Management Agency convened for its regular meeting with a special
speaker on the docket.
Kindra Loomis of Entrix, Inc., a biological consulting firm working
in the Ventura River watershed, spoke to the board and a chamber
room full of concerned farmers, fishermen and activists in a
bid to gain approval for a change in the scope of work associated
with the Ventura River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan.
Loomis gave a comprehensive explanation of the history of the
plan, which is in development by Entrix, and heard concerns from
the gathered throng. The Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency
is one of a number of groups in a coalition of agencies involved
in the formation and approval of the plan and is the lone holdout
in approving the latest changes, which would allow Entrix to
move forward to the next step in the process and stay on track
for what Loomis estimates is a year-long time frame for the plan's
completion.
Loomis explained that the agencies formed the coalition in 1996,
when the National Marine Fisheries Service began looking into
ways to protect Southern California steelhead and other endangered
species in the watershed. Once the steelhead were officially
listed as endangered, all agencies operating in the watershed
with the potential to impact the fish became subject to new permitting
processes.
Entrix came into the proceedings in 1998. Its job is to construct
the HCP, a comprehensive plan coordinated with input from all
participating agencies, that would meet specifications laid down
by NMFS and the Department of Fish and Game, and allow the agencies
to obtain the permits they need to continue to operate in the
watershed.
The current phase is the finalization of the plan, which requires
changing the scope of work and providing impact analysis and
"process upgrade suggestions." But Loomis could not
assuage concerned board members when they brought their suggestions
to the table.
Board member Jerry Conrow expressed displeasure that private
landowners, particularly those in the East End of Ojai, were
left out of the loop. "It bothers me that there's no representation
for this part of the valley," he said. " I don't know
why all the property owners who live along these streams don't
have some kind of a permitting process."
Loomis promised that her group would do its best to see all sides
have input. "We're going to work hard with the agencies
to make sure all needs are met," she said. "It's going
to be a challenge to find that balance and that's our goal."
Conrow, still undeterred, referred the plan as "an illusion"
because it fails, in his estimation, to take into account the
whole system. "We get essentially no benefit, no guidance,
no assistance, from the agencies," he said.
Farmers from around the valley echoed his concerns and expressed
resentment that their needs seemed to be subordinate to those
of the fish. "Our concern in this whole process is, will
the water cost more if we have to provide water to the fish?"
said pixie tangerine farmer Pat Hartman, adding that farmers
already practice conservation methods like drip watering at night.
"If you don't water the trees, they die. I think agriculture
adds a lot to this valley."
While few would argue that point, local fishermen and environmentalists
once again showed up to dispute the notion that a conflict even
exists between fish and farmer.
Local resident Gary Bulla pointed out that the fish will only
require water during storm events and that will come from the
river, not the ground. "It's amazing the amount of misinformation
going around about the steelhead," he said.
"No one is going to be asked to pump well water into the
river."
Russ Baggerly of the Environmental Coalition of Ventura County
picked up where Bulla left off, asking Loomis, "Kindra,
any mention of groundwater (to be released for fish)?"
"Not currently," replied Loomis.
Rather than the fish, Bulla placed the blame on Casitas Municipal
Water District, which did not send a representative to the meeting,
for failing to implement its own water conservation plan. "Of
14 measures they originally identified, I think they've implemented
four of them," he said.
Jim Edmondson of California Trout brought a proposal with a list
of measures his organization believes could ease the process
greatly and offered to share the details with any interested
parties at a later date.
Larry Hartman, husband of Pat, pointed out that each year many
acre-feet of water destined for Lake Casitas spill over the dam
and run to the ocean. "To me, letting water run over the
dam for any purpose, whether it be recreation, fishing, etc.,
is ludicrous," he said.
Clearly, efficient use of a limited supply of water is the key
to solving the multiple dilemmas raised at the meeting. Still,
when each person has a stake somewhere in the watershed, no one
wants to give up what he has.
Flyfisherman Larry Yuva urged everyone present to take a step
back and participate in the spirit of cooperation. "If we
all work together," he said, "We can work this situation
out, but not with an 'us versus them' attitude."
Still, Conrow, at least, semed determined to stick to his guns.
"The permitting is being done in a piecemeal process,"
he said. "Until County Flood Control includes property owners,
I'm not in favor of rubber-stamping this report. I would move
to table this."
City councilwoman and OBGMA president Rae Hanstad agreed that
her constituents need adequate representation but expressed concern
that her group was delaying the process. "I'm hesitant to
hold these other agencies up," she said. "On the other
hand, it's clear that if we put this to a vote tonight, it would
not be a boon to the plan."
In the end, table the decision they did and thus the holdup continues.
Loomis said she'll meet with the other cooperating agencies in
May and hopes the OBGMA will approve the their requested changes
in scope before then.
© 2003
The Ojai Valley News
Back
to the news
|
|